Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faxination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirected to Fenestrae B.V. by Wuahn (non-admin closure by Intelligentsium 23:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
- Faxination (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable product. Borderline advert. Terrible sourcing. Bonewah (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Popular program in Europe, as shown here [1]. Worst case scenario, Merge/Redirect any relevant information to Fenestrae B.V.. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 22:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Fenestrae B.V., which might just barely scrape by as notable; there's nothing worth merging that's not already there. I don't think [2] and [3] are enough to support a full article, and all the other hits for "faxination" seem to be either independently-coined neologisms, misspellings of "fascination", or (most commonly) reprinted press releases. The article creator's rather blatant conflict of interest (e.g., images uploaded with fair-use rationales consisting solely of "promotional" or "marketing") doesn't help matters a bit. —Korath (Talk) 02:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Korath. Pcap ping 07:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.